Intersectionality and COVID-19: Academic Medicine Faculty's Lived Experiences of Well-Being, Workload, and Productivity During the Pandemic.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to utilize an intersectional framework to examine academic faculty's lived experiences during COVID-19. Specifically, we set out to: (1) describe the multiple intersectional identities (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, rank, caregiver status, disability status) represented by the faculty, (2) examine potential disparities in well-being, workload, and productivity linked to these intersectional factors, and (3) identify qualitative themes endorsed by faculty as they relate to lived experiences during COVID-19. Methods: This was a cross-sectional mixed-methods research study. The Center for Women in Medicine and Science (CWIMS) at the University of Minnesota developed and implemented a survey between February-June of 2021 in response to national reports of disparities in the impacts of COVID-19 on faculty with lived experiences from multiple intersections. Results: There were 291 full-time faculty who participated in the study. Quantitative findings indicated that faculty with multiple intersectional identities (e.g., woman+assistant professor+caregiver+underrepresented in medicine) reported greater depression symptoms, work/family conflict, and stress in contrast to faculty with fewer intersectional identities. Furthermore, faculty with more intersectional identities reported higher clinical workloads and service responsibilities and lower productivity with regard to research article submissions, publications, and grant submissions in contrast to faculty with fewer intersectional identities. Qualitative findings supported quantitative findings and broadened understanding of potential underlying reasons. Conclusions: Findings confirm anecdotal evidence that faculty with lived experiences from multiple intersections may be disproportionately experiencing negative outcomes from the pandemic. These findings can inform decisions about how to address these disparities moving into the next several years with regard to promotion and tenure, burnout and well-being, and faculty retention in academic medical settings. Given these findings, it is also important to intentionally plan responses for future public health crises to prevent continued disparities for faculty with multiple intersectional identities.

Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Performed Immediately Prior to Same-Day Biopsy: An Analysis of Index Lesion Enhancement Compared to Histopathology and Follow-up in Patients With Suspicious Ultrasound Findings.

Objective: To measure the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) for the index lesion when it is performed the same day prior to biopsy in patients with suspicious findings at US. Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective study compared radiologist original reports of the presence or absence of index lesion enhancement on CEM to biopsy results and follow-up. The most suspicious lesion or the larger of equally suspicious lesions recommended for biopsy by US after a diagnostic workup including mammography was considered the index lesion. CEM exams were performed the same day, immediately prior to the scheduled biopsy, as requested by the radiologist recommending the biopsy. Numeric variables were summarized with means and standard deviations, or medians and the minimum and maximum, where appropriate. Results: Biopsy demonstrated cancer in 64.7% (200/309) of index lesions. Of these, 197/200 demonstrated enhancement for a sensitivity of 98.5% (95% CI: 95.7%-99.7%) (197/200) and the negative predictive value of CEM for non-enhancing index lesions was 95.1% (58/61; 95% CI: 86.1%-98.4%). The three false negative exams were two grade 1 ER+ HER2- invasive ductal cancers that were 6 mm and 7 mm in size, and a 3-mm grade 2 ductal carcinoma in situ in a complex cystic and solid mass. False positive exams made up 20.6% (51/248) of the positive exams. Conclusion: Diagnostic CEM showed high sensitivity and specificity for cancer in lesions with suspicious US findings. CEM may reduce the need for some biopsies, and negative CEM may support a true negative biopsy result.

Breast MRI during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Lack of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Suppression and Inferior Treatment Response.

Background Suppression of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is commonly observed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at contrast-enhanced breast MRI. It was hypothesized that nonsuppressed BPE may be associated with inferior response to NAC. Purpose To investigate the relationship between lack of BPE suppression and pathologic response. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed for women with menopausal status data who were treated for breast cancer by one of 10 drug arms (standard NAC with or without experimental agents) between May 2010 and November 2016 in the Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging and Molecular Analysis 2, or I-SPY 2 TRIAL (NCT01042379). Patients underwent MRI at four points: before treatment (T0), early treatment (T1), interregimen (T2), and before surgery (T3). BPE was quantitatively measured by using automated fibroglandular tissue segmentation. To test the hypothesis effectively, a subset of examinations with BPE with high-quality segmentation was selected. BPE change from T0 was defined as suppressed or nonsuppressed for each point. The Fisher exact test and the Z tests of proportions with Yates continuity correction were used to examine the relationship between BPE suppression and pathologic complete response (pCR) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HR-negative cohorts. Results A total of 3528 MRI scans from 882 patients (mean age, 48 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) were reviewed and the subset of patients with high-quality BPE segmentation was determined (T1, 433 patients; T2, 396 patients; T3, 380 patients). In the HR-positive cohort, an association between lack of BPE suppression and lower pCR rate was detected at T2 (nonsuppressed vs suppressed, 11.8% [six of 51] vs 28.9% [50 of 173]; difference, 17.1% [95% CI: 4.7, 29.5]; P = .02) and T3 (nonsuppressed vs suppressed, 5.3% [two of 38] vs 27.4% [48 of 175]; difference, 22.2% [95% CI: 10.9, 33.5]; P = .003). In the HR-negative cohort, patients with nonsuppressed BPE had lower estimated pCR rate at all points, but the P values for the association were all greater than .05. Conclusions In hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, lack of background parenchymal enhancement suppression may indicate inferior treatment response. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Philpotts in this issue.

Lymphadenopathy in COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients: Diagnostic Dilemma in Oncologic Patients.

Five cases of axillary lymphadenopathy are presented, which occurred after COVID-19 vaccination and mimicked metastasis in a vulnerable oncologic patient group. Initial radiologic diagnosis raised concerns for metastasis. However, further investigation revealed that patients received COVID-19 vaccinations in the ipsilateral arm prior to imaging. In two cases, lymph node biopsy results confirmed vaccination-related reactive lymphadenopathy. Ipsilateral axillary swelling or lymphadenopathy was reported based on symptoms and physical examination in COVID-19 vaccine trials. Knowledge of the potential for COVID-19 vaccine-related ipsilateral adenopathy is necessary to avoid unnecessary biopsy and change in therapy. © RSNA, 2021.

A Comparison of Methods for High-Spatial-Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Breast MRI.

Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) shows promise in detecting and monitoring breast cancer, but standard spin-echo (SE) echo-planar DWI methods often have poor image quality and low spatial resolution. Proposed alternatives include readout-segmented (RS) echo-planar imaging and axially reformatted (AR)-simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging. Purpose To compare the resolution and image quality of standard SE echo-planar imaging DWI with two high-spatial-resolution alternatives, RS echo-planar and AR-SMS imaging, for breast imaging. Materials and Methods In a prospective study (2016-2018), three 5-minute DWI protocols were acquired at 3.0 T, including standard SE echo-planar imaging, RS echo-planar imaging with five segments, and AR-SMS imaging with four times slice acceleration. Participants were women undergoing breast MRI either as part of a treatment response clinical trial or undergoing breast MRI for screening or suspected cancer. A commercial breast phantom was imaged for resolution comparison. Three breast radiologists reviewed images in random order, including clinical images indicating the lesion, images with b value of 800 sec/mm2, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from the three randomly labeled DWI methods. Readers measured the longest dimension and lesion-average ADC on three DWI methods, reported measurement confidence, and rated or ranked the quality of each image. The scores were fit to a linear mixed-effects model with intercepts for reader and subject. Results The smallest feature (1 mm) was only detectible in a phantom on images from AR-SMS DWI. Thirty lesions from 28 women (mean age, 50 years ± 13 [standard deviation]) were evaluated. On the five-point Likert scale for image quality, AR-SMS imaging scored 1.31 points higher than SE echo-planar imaging and 0.74 points higher than RS echo-planar imaging, whereas RS echo-planar imaging scored 0.57 points higher than SE echo-planar imaging (all P < .001). Conclusion The axially reformatted simultaneous multislice protocol was rated highest for image quality, followed by the readout-segmented echo-planar imaging protocol. Both were rated higher than the standard spin-echo echo-planar imaging. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Partridge in this issue.